Text
Version
Entrez PubMed Overview Help |
FAQ Tutorial New/Noteworthy
PubMed Services Journal
Browser MeSH
Browser Single
Citation Matcher Batch Citation
Matcher Clinical
Queries LinkOut Cubby
Related Resources Order Documents NLM
Gateway TOXNET Consumer
Health Clinical Alerts ClinicalTrials.gov PubMed
Central
Privacy
Policy
|
|
-
Methyl-xanthines for
exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease.
Barr RG, Rowe BH, Camargo CA
Jr.
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and
Women's Hospital, 181 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
gbarr@partners.org
BACKGROUND: International guidelines currently
recommend the use of methyl-xanthines for exacerbations of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for patients who have incomplete
responses to bronchodilators. However, available clinical trials are
small and underpowered to evaluate the benefits and risks of
methyl-xanthines in this acute setting. OBJECTIVES: To determine the
benefit of methyl-xanthines compared to standard care for COPD
exacerbations. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were
identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group COPD Register which is
a compilation of systematic searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and
CENTRAL and hand searching of 20 respiratory journals. In addition,
primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible
studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts
were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only RCTs were eligible for
inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented with acute COPD
exacerbations and were treated with either methyl-xanthines (oral or
intravenous) or placebo (with or without standard care) early in the
acute treatment. Studies also needed to report either pulmonary function
or admission results. Two reviewers independently selected potentially
relevant articles and selected articles for inclusion. Methodological
quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. DATA COLLECTION AND
ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the
authors were unable to verify the validity of information. Missing data
were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in
the paper. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager
4.0.4 Studies were pooled to yield weighted mean differences (WMD) or
odds ratios (OR) and reported using 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
MAIN RESULTS: From 28 identified references, 4 RCTs met inclusion
criteria (172 patients). Mean change in forced expiratory volume in one
second (FEV1) at 2 hours was similar in methyl-xanthine and placebo
groups (FEV1 WMD: -8 ml; 95% CI: -85 to 69 ml). The only study to report
hospitalization rates showed a non-significant reduction with
methyl-xanthines (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1 to 1.8) among 39 patients.
Patients receiving methyl-xanthines had similar improvements in symptom
scores, but reported more gastrointestinal side effects (OR: 5.3; 95%
CI: 1.3 to 21.0) than patients receiving placebo. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the routine use of
methyl-xanthines for COPD exacerbations. Methyl-xanthines do not
appreciably improve FEV1 during COPD exacerbations and cause adverse
effects; evidence of their effect on admissions is
limited.
Publication Types:
PMID: 11279755 [PubMed - indexed for
MEDLINE]
|